WHAT is more alarming about the China Solomons Pact …

Senator Katy Gallagher:

“In times past, we have been the power that countries in the Pacific rely upon, and that has changed under this government’s watch. It has made our position in this region less secure … The prime minister has been missing in action.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/election-2022-live-updates-scott-morrison-and-anthony-albanese-go-head-to-head-in-first-leaders-debate-solomon-islands-china-security-pact-fallout-continues-20220420-p5aevl.html?post=p53mch

AND …

‘The Solomons’ decision to sign a pact with China is a failure of Australian soft power that goes back years, starting with Tony Abbott’s cynical and disastrous decision to rip billions of dollars out of foreign aid in 2014.

As Australia stepped back, Beijing went on an infrastructure blitz throughout the Pacific.’

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-china-solomon-islands-security-deal-is-a-failure-that-goes-back-years-20220420-p5aeqr.html

World leaders are already stressed by the global contest between DEMOCRACY and AUTOCRACY … now confronted by the ‘Solomons deal’ … which enables China to intercede when it believes its ‘foreign investments and DIASPORA’ (the spread of people from their original homeland) are allegedly under threat.

Who are really under threat?

Chinese investment is across the globe – 140 plus nations have joined on to Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative.

China has lent large sums of money to countries for roads, dams, railways, ports and sports facilities.

*Charles Edel, the Australia chair and a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, described the deal in these terms:

“The lesson for the rest of the world is that China is looking to rebalance the global order in its favor,” he said.

“And whether that means opening trade routes, establishing a military facility or signing a security agreement, Beijing will act to benefit its own interests, to the detriment of democracy and an open and free world.”

The Solomons aren’t the only place where the Chinese government has sought to couple security and economic arrangementsit has done so from Djibouti to Pakistan to Cambodia, where China has launched infrastructure projects that helped it gain access to strategic ports. *

Think DARWIN …

“But Mr. Edel said the agreement in the Solomons was “in some ways even more concerning.”

Think real estate: location, location, location.

Because the nation of roughly 900 islands sits across shipping lanes connecting the United States to Asia, the Solomons (and its neighbors) have long been a strategic priority — as Japan showed in World War II …   

“The security deal between China and the Solomon Islands did not materialize out of thin air,” Mr. Edel said.

“China has ramped up its presence and extended its influence across the Pacific over the past decade, and as it has done so, Beijing has been on the hunt for a military base in the region, which would allow it to project power outward and further influence the politics across the Indo-Pacific region.”

READ MORE!

WHAT is luring SINGAPOREANS to the Australian Property Market? As Rents Rise for Australians …

Prime Minister Scott Morrison says builders have been integral to Australia’s economic success. NCA NewsWire/Tertius Pickard Credit: News Corp Australia

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY has only deteriorated further since 2019 …

WITH more Australians now renting crushed by low wages, even more of Our People are increasingly struggling to pay rising rents!

In February 2022 Scott Morrison said:

house prices are rising”, bluntly adding “that’s how the market works”, during an address to the building and construction industry.

https://www.perthnow.com.au/business/scott-morrison-gives-blunt-assessment-of-property-market-thats-how-the-market-works-c-5835139

Isn’t it time we were equally blunt? On 21 May 2022?

Tonight there was a report on the ABC NEWS that neither major party is addressing rising rents!

THIS was not of Labor’s making!  If LABOR wins the election they will be inheriting this Liberal mess!

The Liberals have been in power for nearly a decade!

Remember ‘The NETWORKER’ wrote the policy for the developer lobby group, the PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA before it entered politics …  and obviously this very strong connection maintains …

BECAUSE Singapore, Malaysia and across Asia these foreign buyers are now picking up from where China left off …

SO why didn’t the Morrison Government in the interests of its Constituents then disallow the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) Ruling that allowed developers to sell 100 per cent of ‘new homes’ to foreign buyers?

Currently houses and apartments recorded an average 6.8% and 21.9% year-on-year capital growth, respectively.” Why wouldn’t Singaporeans be tempted for this capital growth, and even more benefits?

Obviously developers all the while called for increasing the SUPPLY because they were unable to keep up with the OVERSEAS DEMAND!

AND why did the ScOmO Government exempt (exclude) the Real Estate Gatekeepers (Real Estate Agents, Lawyers and Accountants) from the second tranche of the ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING LAWS? ….  In October 2018?? And to this day maintains this exemption?

With so much Black Money awash in our Real Estate Market – that too contributed to the escalation of house prices …  with these overseas buyers keen to gain a Permanent Resident Visa from home purchase … how many have been outbidding Australian buyers with black cash … ?

And with a flourishing short-term holiday rental market swallowing up homes for long term rental … we have a rental crisis apart from a housing affordability crisis!

WHY isn’t the NetWorker stopping this with more Australians sleeping in their cars … having to wait ten years for Public Housing, as others resort to sleeping rough in parks or railway station tunnels!

READ MORE!

Why Singaporean investors have their sights on the Austrailian property market

https://sbr.com.sg/commercial-property/news/why-singaporean-investors-have-their-sights-austrailian-property-market

‘ONE SYDNEY PARK’ by Hailiang Property Group to proceed …

PREVIOUSLY CAAN shared this with you that: 

Hailiang Property Group (HPG Australia) controlled by billionaire Chinese industrialist Feng Hailiang entered the Australian market in 2014 and acquired the site at SYDNEY PARK Euston Road from the Goodman Group in early 2015.

In the midst of Australia’s Chinese Real Estate buying spree

A win/win for HPG creating a “new neighbourhood” for their buyers to live within a 44 hectare Park, 6Kms from the Sydney CBD, down the road from Newtown and a five-minute drive to the airport.

A loss of what could have been retained as parkland for the inner West community and beyond!

NEWTOWN where our Millennial sons and daughters rent share houses … or flats …

THE first limited release of apartments at One Sydney Park was launched to the market in March 2018 prior to approval.  WHY?

…  would these apartments be 100% foreign owned? 

FIRB Ruling allows developers to sell 100% ‘new homes’ to foreigners

HPG has shaved its development from 389 to 356 apartments with the building mass pushed back from the park.  That population will impact access to transport, and rob the local community of their amenity …

What does ‘the perceived overall height of the building has been decreased’ mean?

READ MORE!

‘Green light: $700m One Sydney Park development set to proceed’

https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/hpg-australia-one-sydney-park-700m-development-set-to-proceed-20220405-p5ab14.html

Monika Tu … ‘Black Diamondz’ feels Chinese Property Buyers can get picked on

Foreign Buyers have continued to flock to Australia during the Pandemic … not in as many numbers … but they have not only been coming from China’s ‘Mainland’ but Singapore and Hong Kong too!

It is not just Harbourside Mansions they seek … or the Upper North Shore … and the Elite Eastern Suburbs but High-Rise PRECINCTS across Sydney Town … built specifically for this foreign buyer market!

Take a wander or a drive and see for yourself …

… Meadowbank Top Ryde North Ryde Macquarie Park Wentworth Park Rhodes!  It goes forever! Melrose Park, and heaps more! These precincts are largely owned and occupied by Chinese people.

It is reported there are only 1.2 Million Chinese people here … how credible? Very outdated reports.

HOW many more times do we have to read this from Monika Tu?

She said key drivers were lifestyle, education and business prospects.

‘And despite the Covid pandemic, she said her business – which has an annual turnover of $200m – “keeps growing”.’

WHAT does Australia’s stable political environment, strong economy and good education amount to?

In fact underlying all that Ms Tu speaks of Australia’s real estate market is awash with ‘Black Money’ … much of it coming from China …

READ MORE!

‘Who are Pushing Back Against Tranche 2 Anti-Money Laundering Laws?

https://bit.ly/3Ce9kGC

Would these attractions be about the access gained by wealthy Chinese business people having not only acquired residential property to gain Permanent Residency, but also investing in commercial businesses, and access to either free education or the opportunity to send their children to ‘private schools’. 

Obviously this huge influx has led to much competition not only for our housing market, but also investment in business!  And contemplate the consequences …

Apparently Chinese homebuyers allege they ‘are getting picked on’ yet Ms Tu ‘notes the attractiveness of a friendly community’ … ?

Yes, they like what we have …. Or is that what we had?

The proximity to their China and clean air … here for the time being …

– Ms Tu also addresses a “misunderstanding” around the influx of wealthy Chinese property purchasers. And rejects that her clients and numerous others are taking opportunities away from Australians … well how good was it before this huge influx?

It was very good! Before ‘Visa workers’ we had Award Wages and conditions … and 70% home ownership among Australians …

The only competition for housing was a more sustainable 70,000 permanent migrants arriving annually … not Hundreds of Thousands with a temporary Visa to exchange for Permanent Residency after buying our real estate …

IS it any wonder ‘Chinese love the properties’?  And continue to buy up Australia because they can …

The Morrison Government has facilitated this … influenced by the developer lobby groups, The Property Council of Australia, The Urban Taskforce and others …

The Foreign Investment Review Board (the FIRB) is the avenue through which this all takes place.  It was around 2008 that an FIRB ruling allowed developers to sell 100% of ‘new homes’ to foreign buyers .. not content with providing housing for the incumbents they looked to the overseas market particularly of China with its 1.4 Billion people …

With the Howard Government the Middle Class Chinese were lured to buy our real estate and/or education to gain ‘Flexible Citizenship’ which led to a Housing Boom in the early 2000s … 2004!

And so it has continued … increasing the supply of housing for the ‘foreign demand’ locking out Australians …

The increased supply of ‘new housing’ is for foreign buyers … it is not for the Australian home buyer …

Aspiring First Home Buyers had a brief look-in with the Pandemic … those that had wealthy parents to back them …

WHY is it that there have been so many reports of Australians ready with a deposit and/or ‘cash buyers’ unable to secure a sale for 12 months or more?  Having spent every weekend attending auctions with 100 or more around them competing …

Let alone the stories untold!

The International competition for Australian Homes, it appears, began when the FIRB was established in 1976 during the Liberal Fraser Government to advise the Treasurer and the Government on Australia’s foreign investment policy, and its functions are only advisory. The responsibility for making decisions on Policy and Proposals rests with the TREASURER!

Thus it would seem that the Property Sector and the Government of the Day ‘work hand in glove’ ….

SEARCH for ‘Chapter 2: Regulation of Foreign Investment in Housing’


The Spin

‘Australia’s overall foreign investment policy usually encourages overseas buyers to purchase residential property and, as a result, increase the supply of new housing.

Without foreign investment, many new building projects would become unviable.’

Many of us still remember Meadowbank, Top Ryde, North Ryde, Macquarie Park, Wentworth Park, Breakfast Point, Rhodes, and Melrose Park low-rise residential, and/or commercial/industrial areas where our communities lived and worked before storey upon storey deve-lopers made a motza selling overseas … that’s how viable these high-rise precincts are for deve-lopers.

Australians have had no say about high immigration through the backdoor of property investment … a consequence of lobbying and political donations …

We doubt very much the Chinese having gained residency are at all concerned … more likely they are well pleased … smug even …

The FIRB reported a drop in Chinese investment in 2019 due to the Pandemic however with so many having flown here over the past two decades and acting as Permanent Resident Onshore Proxies … perhaps we will never know how much Chinese investment has occurred?

And Ms Tu says that since the Pandemic her business keeps growing!

READ MORE!

‘Real estate: Chinese homebuyers ‘are getting picked on’

https://www.news.com.au/finance/real-estate/buying/real-estate-chinese-homebuyers-are-getting-picked-on/news-story/479bf0c331c794a9a759a79e4eb865ab

CAAN Takes a Look at: ‘Hong Kong firm Far East Consortium’s Mortgage Arm Eyes Market DownUnder, acquires Stake in Local Non-Banking Lender’

 

What is behind this 53% stake in the Australian NON-BANKING LENDER, Mortgageport? 

 

Key Points …

-the mortgage arm of Far East Consortium now has 53% stake in Aussie non-banking lender Mortgageport

-to create new revenue streams and to allow the developer to earn more from provision of capital; create a new earning stream for the group and to unlock the significant value hidden within
the group’s property portfolio

-BC Invest (FEC’s mortgage arm) hopes to expand in Aust domestic mortgage market; that banks have not focused on

-this Hong Kong company provides non-resident mortgages, asset management and accounting

-it is anticipated that the new capital and funding support will allow Mortgageport to triple its assets within a few years; and establish it as one of the top three non-banking mortgage managers
in Aust. domestic market

-the plan to leverage growth in its existing markets; to use infrastructure and resources to capitalize in A$2 Trillion domestic mortgage market

-BCI maintains its non-resident mortgages to be supported by adding domestic mortgages; non-banking lenders account for 10% of the market share in Aust. Domestic mortgages

-a surge of Hong Kong buyers for property in the UK, Australia and Canada

.those buying Australian property mostly opt for non-banking lenders   

WOULD that be because these lenders are not bound by the Banks Anti-Money Laundering Laws? (the second tranche of the AML Laws)?

Not surprising, is it?  When on ABC Radio (news radio) heard an interview with the CEO of Transparency International about its submission to an inquiry about:

-money laundering particularly in property

-the failure of our controls legislation

-who’s doing it here?   

View Related Article:  ‘Widespread Money Laundering in Property Locking Out Australians from Owning Homes, Senate told’

The Senate is probing the strength of Australia’s money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws, and heard on Tuesday from anti-corruption group Transparency International Australia and its director, former Austrac general counsel Russell Wilson.*

AND …

Transparency International Australia’s chief executive, Serena Lillywhite, said Australia had become the “destination of choice” for the flow of illicit funds, particularly for “corruption-related proceeds, which too often do end up in the property market”.

THIS is very good from Transparency International, but whether any headway will be made is another question after all SCOMO said it today … he doesn’t believe in compulsory rules (unless it suits them) i.e. in his statement about electric vehicles and the comparisons being made to the SHORTEN Policy … that he’s now largely copying … 

READ MORE!

https://www.scmp.com/business/companies/article/3155329/hong-kong-firm-far-east-consortiums-mortgage-arm-eyes-market

 

 

 

 

More about What is behind the Pandora Papers?

ALAN KOHLER writes in ‘The Real Scandal in the Pandora Papers’

‘The most disturbing part of the Four Corners program this week about the PANDORA PAPERS leak was the statement by Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson that lobbying and donations by lawyers, accountants and real estate agents have successfully blocked any action on money laundering in Australia.

CAAN:  Sadly this is true!

HOW did this ‘Pushback’ happen?  Lobbying by the Real Estate Institute and the Law Council!   

It appears the gatekeepers dodged the responsibility by passing the buck when then President of the Real Estate Institute of Australia, Adrian Kelly said that others should also bear the regulatory burden.

“We are working with government on an approach that minimises the impact on agents because much of the information can be sought from others involved in the transaction process, including the banks and their conveying process,” he said.

When it was unlikely that funds were being transferred through the Australian Banking system, but rather through black cash, shadow banking and wire transfer of the money to an offshore bank account in a tax haven to be laundered in Casinos and Australian Real Estate!

Experts say tens of billions of dollars would have been moved from China to Australia by Chinese kleptocrats, as corrupt officials attempt to park their funds in a safe jurisdiction. 

President of the Law Council of Australia Arthur Moses, SC, said their profession was already extensively regulated by the states and territories under a comprehensive and robust regulatory system.

“The Law Council is concerned that imposing the full AML/CTF regulatory regime may create conflicts with the lawyer’s duty of confidentiality and the principle of client professional privilege, as well as increasing the cost of legal services to the community,” he said.

IS that credible?

WHY is it with the purchase of real estate there should be some difference compared to buying or selling a vehicle, why is it different?

Why is it difficult to apply laws to the purchase of real estate?

Why is that compromising a lawyer?  Why should real estate be any different to any other matter?

If there are laws governing real estate so be it.  It should not make any difference to a lawyer. If lawyers have a matter before them that involves a crime they have two choices:

-do it for their client knowing their risk

-not do it

IT was the Morrison Government that exempted the Real Estate Gatekeepers in October 2018!

Read more!

‘Real estate agents, lawyers and accountants to avoid money laundering laws’

https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/real-estate-agents-lawyers-and-accountants-to-avoid-money-laundering-laws-20181008-h16dcd

IN fact the second tranche of the Anti-Money Laundering Laws applicable to the Real Estate Gatekeepers (real estate agents, lawyers, and accountants ) was shelved back in 2006 … so it sat there until October 2018 when the Morrison Government exempted these gatekeepers from the AML Laws unlike the Banks!

Alan Kohler writes …. ‘ …. and both major parties apparently complying, is both sadly believable and shameful.’

The Federal Labor Party failed to implement and enforce the second tranche during its term from 2007 to 2013.  But nor did the Liberal Coalition implement the second tranche for the gatekeepers from 2013 to date 2021! 

In the lead-up to the 2019 Election in February 2019 Shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen promised to make cross-border financial crime a pillar of Labor’s election campaign in wake of the Hayne royal commission, including pledging to reverse cuts to the Australian Federal Police and Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg in response also flagged additional funding in the April 2 budget for the financial regulators including ASIC, and it is understood  they were to commit additional money and staff for the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre.

Labor’s pledge came amid concerns over private-sector “bounty hunters” acting for China to recoup the proceeds of financial crime and corruption funnelled into Australia’s property market.

The Morrison government promised to pass new anti-money laundering laws in 2018, but they were yet to pass Parliament, granting lawyers, accountants and estate agents a reprieve.!!

Mr Bowen promised to go further, but the industry signalled a fight.

“The government has completely dropped the ball on money laundering reform. According to the government’s own work plan, real estate agents should already be covered by our money laundering laws. The Liberals have done nothing to progress this,” Mr Bowen said.

“The Liberals aren’t interested in prosecuting serious financial crime,” he said. “They cut funding to ASIC, they planned to cut funding to the Serious Financial Crime Taskforce and they ripped hundreds of millions of dollars out of the Australian Federal Police, who work with our partners abroad to disrupt transnational organised crime,” the shadow treasurer said.

Read more!

‘Labor to Target Lawyers Accountants Real Estate Agents’

https://www.afr.com/companies/labor-to-target-lawyers-accountants-real-estate-agents-20190224-h1bnd3

The Liberal party pursued a very dirty ‘Labor Taxes’ Campaign … AND here we are now!

With a property BOOOM that has locked out both First Home Buyers and Sellers!

Alan Kohler writes ‘Inaction on both sides’. 

Last December, the government put forward a minor amendment to the AMLTCF law and the Greens used it to put up a further amendment requiring that second tranche to be legislated by July 1 this year.

Both major parties voted against it.

PERHAPS Labor has another plan … because it was so open prior to the 2019 Election it is not now going to follow the same path … ?

In announcing Labor’s vote, Senator Kimberley Kitching said: “While we support the intent of the additional designated services proposed by the Greens, Labor does not believe this is the right way to achieve considered law reform. We are concerned about the unintended consequences of this amendment and want to make sure our counterterrorism financing laws make it harder, not easier, for money launderers or terrorist financiers.”

According to the Greens’ Treasury spokesman, Senator Nick McKim, “Australia is now one of only six countries in the world not to have included the gatekeepers within the scope of anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing laws”.

The others are the United States, China, Madagascar, Mauritius and Mongolia.

MANY of us question what benefits are there for us with a Foreign Investment Review Board running, it appears, contrary to our interests, with so much competition, and much of it hidden, for our Property (residential, commercial and agricultural)? 

The Morrison Government in exempting the Real Estate Gatekeepers from the AML Laws has allowed this competition to flourish locking out even more Australians from owning a home in their own country as the gatekeepers prosper even more.  With Agents working buyer against buyer, and some hidden, to bid up prices as Australian buyers are left to languish on the sidelines.

DESPITE there having been all too numerous reports on money raised in China through real estate and bank loan fraud …

And the AFP has alleged the proceeds of crime have been used to purchase or develop properties in Australia

The Paris based Financial Action Taskforce (FATF) found that Australian homes are a haven for laundered funds, particularly from China.

Transparency International ranked Australia as having the weakest anti-money laundering laws in the Anglosphere; failing all 10 priority areas.

The OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions claimed the entire ecosystem for the buying and selling property using cross-border fund flows is beyond the reach of Australian regulators!

Read more!

AFP Melbourne Tasmania Property alleged Chinese Money Laundering’

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-31/afp-melbourne-tasmania-property-alleged-chinese-money-laundering/11657344?pfmredir=sm

IS it any wonder that the evidence for residential buying is more sketchy? 

THE solution would be not only to implement and enforce the second tranche of the AML Laws, but to stop allowing foreign investment in Australian property!
To put a stop to onshore Proxy buyers

All these international organisations have raised concerns about the proceeds of crime driving up property prices, and pricing legitimate buyers out of the market yet the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Tax and Revenue, Jason Falinski, who is currently running an inquiry into housing affordability and supply, told Alan Kohler that he thinks that’s simply not true.

WHY?  Was Jason Falinski out of the room when the Morrison Government exempted the Real Estate Gatekeepers from the second tranche of the AML Laws in October 2018?

WHAT is possibly behind Falinski’s response?  Could it be something to do with …


‘The Big Ten Donors Property Developers Ratchet up their Spending on Politicians’

https://www.michaelwest.com.au/the-big-ten-donors-property-developers-ratchet-up-their-spending-on-politicians/?fbclid=IwAR3RgQkaY8z1xBNMWoitvJOlDyk2ZTb4-pJlMm35_7PgOmxzPLV-vzCtjwA

AND so with these big Ten Donors working both sides … and Labor severely hamstrung as are we!

Bill Shorten called for a stop to political donations … but of course that was overruled by the Liberals – for obvious reasons – as they are in receipt of the large share!

‘In 2019, disclosed donations reached an all-time annual high of $5.6 million in anticipation of the Federal election. Of this, 72% or just over $4 million came from a single source, Sugolena Ptd Ltd. Sugolena’s donation was exclusively to the Federal Liberal Party.

‘The Miracle’!

That year, Sugolena was the Liberal Party’s second-biggest single donor, behind the party’s fundraising arm The Cormack Foundation.’

Sugolena, owned by property tycoon Isaac Wakil, donated a staggering $4,162,448 to the Liberals and the Liberal National Party in Queensland. Mr Wakil himself donated $32,073 to the NSW Liberals.

Read more!

‘Property Industry Donations Favour the Coalition about Eight to One AEC Figures show’

https://www.domain.com.au/news/property-industry-donations-favour-the-coalition-about-eight-to-one-aec-figures-show-927046/

BACKGROUND

Scott Morrison wrote the policy for the developer lobby group, the Property Council of Australia before entering politics …

What does Evergrande’s Debt Crisis really mean for Australia?

IS it because the CHINESE all have excessive high debt levels?

NEXT …

Does BEIJING have the resources to save Evergrande?

With the economy weighed down by debt and COVID-19 where will the cash come from?

PRIOR to COVID-19 in late 2019 China had incurred 7 X more debt than gross domestic product

WITH a $3 Trillion fall in market value of China’s most productive companies

-printing renminbi in the absence of real growth would lead to hyper-inflation

-too many Evergrandes

e.g. Sinic Holdings Group; its stock dropped 87%

.Guangzhou R & F Properties also facing serious difficulties

.Chinese banks are exposed

CHINA’s property sector is seizing up; home sales are falling quickly

IF Chinese leaders prevent a Lehman style crash by mobilizing state enterprises and banks China could face a decade or more of stagnation!

.debt to GDP ratio soared by nearly 45% in 5 years

.Evergrande’s debt amounts to 3% of China’s annual GDP

WHY would China face a decade or more of stagnation?

Because the CHINESE all have excessive high debt levels!

WHAT does this mean for the U.S. and AUSTRALIA?

READ MORE!

‘EVERGRANDE’S Debt Crisis: Time to Ditch China’

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/573397-evergrandes-debt-crisis-time-to-ditch-china

Strong Chinese Property Transactions in Sydney undeterred by the Pandemic

So far this year, most Asian capital has flowed from Singapore, followed by China and Hong Kong, according to Real Capital Analytics.

Is leading property firm Colliers sourcing its buyer base from Asia?

Not only are these buyers lured by Australia’s management of the Pandemic compared to Europe and the US, but our inflated Sydney house prices of 24% to June

… Lured by a wide selection of asset types available for purchase, and the lovely weather and blue sky.

And with the added benefit of ‘Permanent Residency’ and Medicare following purchase, and ‘hot money’ can be laundered too! So they have a lot of cash to splash! Pushing up prices …

Are Australian property buyers locked out?  With these Asian buyers notified first in an ‘email blast’ … even before these properties hit the market! 

A case in point in Ashfield where an Asian deve-loper bought an 850 M2 vacant block for $4.6M!

And contracts were exchanged within a week regardless of the lockdown!

So what is ScOmO’s Sub deal all about?

READ MORE!

https://www.commercialrealestate.com.au/news/asian-investment-1089596/

ABC Q & A With Economist Yanis Varoufakis on Australia’s Economic Response to Covid-19

ABC Q & A: 9 SEPTEMBER 2021 WITH ECONOMIST JANIS VAROUFAKIS

How would Yanis Varoufakis rate Australia’s economic response to COVID-19? #QandA

QUESTION FROM BOJAN STANOJCIC:

How would you rate Australia’s economic response to the Covid-19 Crisis, and if you were in charge would you have done things differently?

YANIS VAROUFAKIS:

All the boring questions come to me because I have this predicament of being an economist, and a Greek Economist.

Okay, I shall compare the treatment – the response during the Covid-19 period to what happened after 2009 under the Kevin Rudd Government, after the GFC.

Both responses were large. The 2009 response was more effective in a sense that money went directly to families, independently of their circumstances.

So it was a more efficient system.

The support of the Australian economy now – during the Pandemic has been larger, and it had to be larger because the shock was greater, but I very much fear that it has created a large wall of money – which as the Pandemic recedes – and we hope it will soon so that I can come and visit my daughter to begin with – that this wall of money is not going to fuel house prices, yet again, asset prices because this is the great scourge of the Australian political economyHOUSING!

If all this money becomes higher asset prices it will be a monumental waste of all this liquidity that has been created by the Bank of Australia instead of going into investing so that we have good green jobs for experts, for the Arts – for that matter which is not a luxury to be added on to whatever else Australians are doing.

So to cut a long story short, take this liquidity and put it to good use, and do not waste it on real estate!

PART 2 WITH YANIS VAROUFAKIS:

VIRGINIA TRIOLI:

… Yanis, something that you have noted, and that concerns you, is that Australia is falling behind not only because the model that we have relied on for quite some time, which is our heavy reliance on China you regard that as out-moded that that is finished, and that we need to look elsewhere.

What is the solution to that, Yanis?

YANIS VAROUFAKIS:

Investment! It is not just Australia by the way; not being critical of Australia. It is also the European Union. The two blocks that are suffering, if you want, I consider Australia a small block, and the European Union. The European Union and Australia.

Because the business models of both Europe and Australia have relied upon for prosperity are now defunct, and it is the United States and China that are steaming ahead, coming out of the crisis stronger.

This, of course, is clouded over by the merging Cold War between them, and Australia and the European Union are running a very serious risk of being left behind.

Because the … future are Green Energy, artificial intelligence, robotics, and this is where there is insufficient investment – both in Australia and in the European Union.

And at the same time we have to remember that if Sierra Leone, or you know, some developing country that is simply impoverished are not investing – well you can understand that they don’t have the money to invest.

But both Australia and the European Union – we are swimming in money. We never had so much money as we have today, but we are wasting it, we are not investing it into the things that we need, and I totally concur with the point we just heard about the manner in which Women’s rising discontent has been completely ignored by the Government.

But in the end, imagine we were exploring The Universe – Startrek like – and we chanced upon some alien Civilisation we would look at where they were putting their resources you know judge their collective character.

Where are we putting our resources today? In the large corporations that are already sitting on a huge stash of – into men and into the powerful …

(Interview disrupted due to being out of sync.)

WATCH AND PLEASE SHARE!

https://twitter.com/i/status/1435926721568534528

The Feds berated for shifty foreign investment in Tasmania

The Morrison Government has been berated for shifty foreign investment in Tasmania

View the Media Release from Peter Whish Wilson

The Senate Inquiry Report, ‘The Senate Economics References Committee Greenfields, Cash Cows and the Regulations of Foreign Investment in Australia’

Greenfields, cash cows and the regulation of foreign investment in Australia (aph.gov.au)

reveals serious flaws in Australia’s foreign investment approval process, and Australia’s corporate transparency and anti-money laundering regime.

Three outstanding overseas investment approvals were analysed:

-the Musselroe Bay Resort development; part of a money laundering scheme

Bellamy’s takeover by Mengniu

Van Diemen’s Land (VDL) Dairy takeover by Moon Lake Investments

Senator Peter Whish Wilson summed up the problems with FIRB approvals:

-at the discretion of the Treasurer

-lack of transparency; allowing a government to extract an arrangement with foreign investors free from public scrutiny to suit its political ends

-the sale of VDL to Moon Lake, a political donor to the Liberal Party over that of a local consortium

Recommendations were made, but we ask why the need for foreign investment when Australia is a wealthy nation? The answer, it would seem, is apparent ….