Why ‘the Mob’ rules NSW Planning

AND ‘ALL OF US’!

CAAN takes a look at: ‘Semi-cooked’: Property sector asks new minister to rethink predecessor’s reforms

AND it would appear what the Property Council of Australia NSW Executive Director Achterstraat is really saying that with open green space, more liveable apartments, and sustainable design that there would be le$$ in it for them …

AFTERALL it was Roberts – when Planning Minister for the first time – in a forum in September 2018 who delivered this ‘snow job’:

“overdevelopment does not exist, infrastructure failure exists”, and Sydney’s “bumbling planning history” meant infrastructure and services needed to meet or exceed housing growth.

SO with this reappointment … it’s back to OVERDEVELOPMENT … and if the ScOmO grubment returns in 2022 the World will be flying in to exhaust ‘the supply’ …. creating more demand

We repeat:  It was ScOmO who wrote the policy for the Property Council of Australia prior to entering politics

Rather than Sydneysiders benefitting from Stokes ‘Design and Place state planning policy’ with apartments allowing for working from home, more access to green spaces and cycleways (liveability)

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/bike-friendly-green-space-working-from-home-new-planning-blueprint-for-life-after-covid-19-20210224-p575hy.html

This is about developing more dwellings (slums) … storey upon storey

IT is pretty clear why Roberts was reappointed as Planning Minister and why Stokes was moved on with a Cabinet reshuffle 11 days after he released his ‘Design and Place State Planning Policy’.

Read more!

‘Semi-cooked’: Property sector asks new minister to rethink predecessor’s reforms

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/semi-cooked-property-sector-asks-new-minister-to-rethink-predecessor-s-reforms-20211223-p59js5.html?fbclid=IwAR2Vrt7_2QD1ZwWBXheLr3YcSoIz6NDBPSDPNNCE8gnpSGhrKfQDOx9VEcc